|
Meeting Location: Oroville, Board of Supervisors Chambers | 9:00
am
-
Study Area 5 Magalia-Paradise Pines
(PC Vote to support Alt 4 per CAC recommendation with a cap of 400
new dwelling units in this area: 4-1 (Marin))
- Study Area 7
Concow (PC Vote to
support Alt 2; no significant increase in dwelling units, confirming
CAC Vote: 4-0-1 (Marin))
-
Study Area 10 Skyway-Neal Road
(PC Vote to include the 165 dwelling units as a Planned Unit
Development (PUD) at Tuscan Ridge and Alt 1 (existing General Plan) for the rest of the
area: 3-2 (Leland, Lambert))
-
Study Area 11 Paradise Urban Reserve
(PC Vote for Urban Reserve per CAC recommendation: 5-0)
-
Study Area 12 Southeast Paradise Specific Plan
(PC Vote to support a Specific Plan for this study area with the
Town of Paradise at the lead and supporting CAC recommendation for
Urban Reserve: 5-0)
-
Study Area 13 South Paradise-Pentz Road
(PC Vote in support of keeping the existing residential designation
to allow 1 unit per acre, probably clustered with a maximum of 335
dwelling units as part of a PUD: 5-0)
-
Study Area 20 Highway 191-Durham Pentz
(PC Vote for Alt 1, Ag only, no retail on NE corner: 4-1 (Marin))
-
Study Area
8 Berry Creek (PC Vote to
support Alt 4 per Community Request and CAC recommendation: 5-0)
- Study Area
21 Thermalito (PC Vote to
support CAC recommendation: 5-0)
-
Study Area 23 Eastern Oroville-Oroville Hills
(PC Vote to support CAC recommendation with the addition of various
Ag Lands being protected in the 'Banana Belt' (Specialty Ag),
eliminate Miner's Ranch Road Mixed Use, and clarified that Versie's
Place and Moss Property were not to be included in Resource
Conservation Zone: 5-0)
-
Study Area 24 Stringtown Mountain
(PC Vote to support Alt 4 per Developer request and CAC
recommendation: 4-1 (Nelson))
-
Study Area 25 Thermalito Aftrebay Area
(PC Vote to support Alt 2 (Ag) 4-1 (Wilson))
-
Study Area 26 Las Plumas-Southside-Ophir Road
(PC Vote to support Alt 4 per City of Oroville Request and CAC
recommendation: 4-1 (Marin)
-
Study Area 27 Pacific Heights Road-SR-70
(PC Vote to support CAC recommendation with a Specific Plan Overlay; keeping it in Ag : 4-1 (Nelson)
-
Study Area 28 Southern Oroville
(PC Vote to support CAC recommendation: 5-0)
- Study Area 29
Palermo (PC Vote to support
CAC recommendation: 5-0)
- Study Area 30
Bangor (PC Vote to support CAC
recommendation restricting Retail Zoning to current properties: 5-0)
In summary, at this
meeting, the Planning Commission agreed with the CAC about 75% of
the time.
Study Areas listed below will be reviewed on
June 13, 2008
-
Study Areas 31, 33 and 34 Biggs and Gridley Area
-
Study Area 14 Nance Canyon -SR-99
-
Study Area 15 Hamlin Canyon-SR-99
-
Study Area 16 Oroville Chico Highway-SR-99
- Study Area 17
Durham
-
Study Area 18 Durham Dayton-SR-99
-
Study Area 19 Durham Pentz-SR-99
-
Study Area 2 North Chico Specific Plan
- Study Area
3 Bell Muir
- Study
Area 4 Forest Ranch
-
Study Area 6 Upper Stilson Canyon
-
Study Area 9 Doe Mill-Honey Run
Meeting Series #4
Alternatives Evaluation and Selection (Task F)
This is the meeting for the Planning Commission to
review CAC recommendations (April & May, 2008
meetings) and public
input (from the March 27, 2008 meeting) regarding
alternatives, constraints and study areas.
They will provide a recommendation to the Board of
Supervisors on each Study Area/Alternative.
From this meeting
series County staff and the DC&E team will obtain
final direction on a preferred land use alternative.
At the community workshop, DC&E will present the
alternatives evaluation and facilitate small group
discussions to gather public input on alternative
preference. After hearing public input on the
alternatives, the Citizens Advisory Committee will
provide County staff and DC&E with their input as to
their preferred alternative. While the preferred
alternative may be one of those presented, it is
more likely that it will comprise a hybrid of
components from more than one alternative. County
staff and DC&E will then present the Citizens
Advisory Committee’s recommendation to the Planning
Commission for their review, input and
recommendation. The Board of Supervisors will
provide final direction regarding the preferred
alternative. Based on feedback from the Board of
Supervisors, County staff and DC&E will make any
needed refinements to create the final preferred
alternative.
|
|