Butte County General Plan 2030

General Plan Homepage

LOGIN

Development Services Homepage

 

 

 

2008-05-30 (Friday) - Planning Commission Meeting - Workshop Series #4-3B


Meeting Location:  Oroville, Board of Supervisors Chambers | 9:00 am

Videos - Session 1 | Session 2Session 3 | Session 4 | Session 5

- Study Area 5 Magalia-Paradise Pines (PC Vote to support Alt 4 per CAC recommendation with a cap of 400 new dwelling units in this area: 4-1 (Marin))
- Study Area 7 Concow (PC Vote to support Alt 2; no significant increase in dwelling units, confirming CAC Vote: 4-0-1 (Marin))
- Study Area 10 Skyway-Neal Road (PC Vote to include the 165 dwelling units as a Planned Unit Development (PUD) at Tuscan Ridge and Alt 1 (existing General Plan) for the rest of the area: 3-2 (Leland, Lambert))
- Study Area 11 Paradise Urban Reserve (PC Vote for Urban Reserve per CAC recommendation: 5-0)
- Study Area 12 Southeast Paradise Specific Plan (PC Vote to support a Specific Plan for this study area with the Town of Paradise at the lead and supporting CAC recommendation for Urban Reserve: 5-0)
- Study Area 13 South Paradise-Pentz Road (PC Vote in support of keeping the existing residential designation to allow 1 unit per acre, probably clustered with a maximum of 335 dwelling units as part of a PUD: 5-0)
- Study Area 20 Highway 191-Durham Pentz (PC Vote for Alt 1, Ag only, no retail on NE corner: 4-1 (Marin))

- Study Area 8 Berry Creek (PC Vote to support Alt 4 per Community Request and CAC recommendation: 5-0)
- Study Area 21 Thermalito (PC Vote to support CAC recommendation: 5-0)
- Study Area 23 Eastern Oroville-Oroville Hills (PC Vote to support CAC recommendation with the addition of various Ag Lands being protected in the 'Banana Belt' (Specialty Ag), eliminate Miner's Ranch Road Mixed Use, and clarified that Versie's Place and Moss Property were not to be included in Resource Conservation Zone: 5-0)
- Study Area 24 Stringtown Mountain (PC Vote to support Alt 4 per Developer request and CAC recommendation: 4-1 (Nelson))
- Study Area 25 Thermalito Aftrebay Area (PC Vote to support Alt 2 (Ag) 4-1 (Wilson))
- Study Area 26 Las Plumas-Southside-Ophir Road (PC Vote to support Alt 4 per City of Oroville Request and CAC recommendation: 4-1 (Marin)
- Study Area 27 Pacific Heights Road-SR-70 (PC Vote to support CAC recommendation with a Specific Plan Overlay; keeping it in Ag : 4-1 (Nelson)
- Study Area 28 Southern Oroville (PC Vote to support CAC recommendation: 5-0)
- Study Area 29 Palermo (PC Vote to support CAC recommendation: 5-0)
- Study Area 30 Bangor (PC Vote to support CAC recommendation restricting Retail Zoning to current properties: 5-0)

In summary, at this meeting, the Planning Commission agreed with the CAC about 75% of the time.

Study Areas listed below will be reviewed on June 13, 2008

- Study Areas 31, 33 and 34 Biggs and Gridley Area

- Study Area 14 Nance Canyon -SR-99
- Study Area 15 Hamlin Canyon-SR-99
- Study Area 16 Oroville Chico Highway-SR-99
- Study Area 17 Durham
- Study Area 18 Durham Dayton-SR-99
- Study Area 19 Durham Pentz-SR-99
- Study Area 2 North Chico Specific Plan
- Study Area 3 Bell Muir
- Study Area 4 Forest Ranch
- Study Area 6 Upper Stilson Canyon
- Study Area 9 Doe Mill-Honey Run

Meeting Series #4 Alternatives Evaluation and Selection (Task F)

This is the meeting for the Planning Commission to review CAC recommendations (April & May, 2008 meetings) and public input (from the March 27, 2008 meeting) regarding alternatives, constraints and study areas.  They will provide a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors on each Study Area/Alternative.

From this meeting series County staff and the DC&E team will obtain final direction on a preferred land use alternative. At the community workshop, DC&E will present the alternatives evaluation and facilitate small group discussions to gather public input on alternative preference. After hearing public input on the alternatives, the Citizens Advisory Committee will provide County staff and DC&E with their input as to their preferred alternative. While the preferred alternative may be one of those presented, it is more likely that it will comprise a hybrid of components from more than one alternative. County staff and DC&E will then present the Citizens Advisory Committee’s recommendation to the Planning Commission for their review, input and recommendation. The Board of Supervisors will provide final direction regarding the preferred alternative. Based on feedback from the Board of Supervisors, County staff and DC&E will make any needed refinements to create the final preferred alternative.

 

© Copyright 2006-2010, Butte County Department of Development Services
For questions or information regarding our website, please contact
dswebmaster