|
Meeting Location: Oroville, Board of Supervisors Chambers | 9:00
am (meeting that will be continued from May 30, 2008 to finalize
the Planning Commission's recommendation on Study Areas for Butte
County General Plan 2030)
NOTE: Commissioner Marin was absent for this meeting due
to the serious wildfire near Paradise. Mid morning,
Commissioner Wilson was called away due to a new fire that erupted
near his home. A decision was made by those Commissioners
remaining to move forward with the 3 remaining Commissioners
present. At the end of the meeting, the Commission (3-0) voted
to forward their work product on Workshop Series #4-3 to the Board
of Supervisors for consideration on July 29, 2008. Below,
after each Study Area reviewed at this meeting, you will find a
brief summary of the voting recommendation -
Voting Summary from both Planning Commission Meetings (5-30-08 &
6-13-08) |
Final Meeting Summary <posted 2008-05-28>
Public Comments Received at Meeting
Article III. Zone Districts |
Butte
Valley Area map |
City of Chico Memo 4-24-08 |
Research and Business Park proposed site locations |
Upper
Stilson Canyon |
Additional public comments <updated 2008-07-01>
-
Study Areas 31, 33 and 34 Biggs and Gridley Area (PC Vote to
support CAC recommendation for Urban Reserve designation and work on
Policies in Workshop Series #5 for implementation: 4-0) (Marin
absent)
-
Study Area 14 Nance Canyon -SR-99
(PC Vote NOT to support CAC recommendation, rather they supported
Alternative #1, to leave this Study Area in Agricultural designation:
3-0) (Marin & Wilson absent)
-
Study Area 15 Hamlin Canyon-SR-99
(PC Vote NOT to support CAC recommendation, rather they supported
Alternative #1, to leave this Study Area in Agricultural designation
and to research the area near Durham Pentz/Hwy 99 regarding an
existing Development Agreement: 3-0) (Marin & Wilson absent)
-
Study Area 16 Oroville Chico Highway-SR-99
(PC Vote to support the CAC recommendation for Alternative #1/2, to
leave this Study Area in Agricultural designation: 3-0) (Marin &
Wilson absent)
- Study Area 17
Durham (PC Vote to support
the CAC recommendation to leave the Durham-Dayton-Nelson plan as the
lead document for this area and noted Mr. Alvarado's concern about
his 10 acres adjacent to the community boundary that should be
considered later for possibly moving the community boundary...but
this would need to be studied, possibly at the time the Zoning
Ordinance is written: 3-0) (Marin & Wilson absent)
-
Study Area 18 Durham Dayton-SR-99
(PC Vote NOT to support CAC recommendation, rather they supported
Alternative #1/2, to leave this Study Area in Agricultural
designation: 3-0) (Marin & Wilson absent)
-
Study Area 19 Durham Pentz-SR-99
(PC Vote to support CAC recommendation, Alternative #1/2, to leave
this Study Area in Agricultural designation and to research the area
near Durham Pentz/Hwy 99 regarding an existing Development Agreement:
3-0) (Marin & Wilson absent)
-
Study Area 2 North Chico Specific Plan (PC Vote to
support CAC recommendation for Alternative #1, maintaining the
existing Specific Plan and to work with the city of Chico on a
strategy to annex the undeveloped Village Core: 4-0) (Marin absent)
- Study Area
3 Bell Muir (PC Vote to
support CAC recommendation for Alternative #4, Urban Reserve
designation and work on Policies in Workshop Series #5 for
implementation (explore the concept of a 5 year limitation on the
Urban Reserve designation to allow time for the County and City of
Chico to develop an annexation strategy): 4-0) (Marin absent)
- Study
Area 4 Forest Ranch (PC Vote to
support CAC recommendation for Alternative 2/3: 4-0) (Marin absent)
-
Study Area 6 Upper Stilson Canyon (PC
Vote NOT to support CAC recommendation, rather they supported
Alternative #2, Resource Conservation: 2-1 (Nelson) (Marin & Wilson
absent)
-
Study Area 9 Doe Mill-Honey Run
(PC Vote NOT to support CAC recommendation, rather they supported an
Urban Reserve Designation for this area and that it should be
developed only under City of Chico jurisdiction within 5 years.
If it does not move forward with the City of Chico in this time
period, re-evaluate it: 3-0) (Marin & Wilson absent)
Study Areas listed below were
reviewed on May 30, 2008
-
Study Area 5 Magalia-Paradise Pines
- Study Area 7
Concow
-
Study Area 10 Skyway-Neal Road
-
Study Area 11 Paradise Urban Reserve
-
Study Area 12 Southeast Paradise Specific Plan
-
Study Area 13 South Paradise-Pentz Road
-
Study Area 20 Highway 191-Durham Pentz
-
Study Area
8 Berry Creek
- Study Area
21 Thermalito
-
Study Area 23 Eastern Oroville-Oroville Hills
-
Study Area 24 Stringtown Mountain
-
Study Area 25 Thermalito Aftrebay Area
-
Study Area 26 Las Plumas-Southside-Ophir Road
-
Study Area 27 Pacific Heights Road-SR-70
-
Study Area 28 Southern Oroville
- Study Area 29
Palermo
- Study Area 30
Bangor
Meeting Series #4
Alternatives Evaluation and Selection (Task F)
This is the meeting for the Planning Commission to
review CAC recommendations (April & May, 2008
meetings) and public
input (from the March 27, 2008 meeting) regarding
alternatives, constraints and study areas.
They will provide a recommendation to the Board of
Supervisors on each Study Area/Alternative.
From this meeting
series County staff and the DC&E team will obtain
final direction on a preferred land use alternative.
At the community workshop, DC&E will present the
alternatives evaluation and facilitate small group
discussions to gather public input on alternative
preference. After hearing public input on the
alternatives, the Citizens Advisory Committee will
provide County staff and DC&E with their input as to
their preferred alternative. While the preferred
alternative may be one of those presented, it is
more likely that it will comprise a hybrid of
components from more than one alternative. County
staff and DC&E will then present the Citizens
Advisory Committee’s recommendation to the Planning
Commission for their review, input and
recommendation. The Board of Supervisors will
provide final direction regarding the preferred
alternative. Based on feedback from the Board of
Supervisors, County staff and DC&E will make any
needed refinements to create the final preferred
alternative.
|
|
